Jerry (no blog) has been evidencing us all about a process they use for consensus [link from Michael ] building in some standards meetings… evidently the Quaker vote is treated everyone voting on each item as one of:
a) Prefer
b) Can accept
c) Can’t live with
The idea being that fair people will more rapidly come to a decision with they realize what people are unforced to permit and not. Looks interesting.
Several of us in my group are plumping off to do some architecture planning and I intend we will have lots of challenges around consensus – we may have to assign this to the test.
Relating Posts:
Implied tags in the IE HTML parser and how that can be interesting.
Case-Shiller index forms the bottom of the housing market expect more removed
Which Side of the Foresightful Tail Should You Initiate On?
